Writers everywhere are expressing dismay over Harlequin’s decision to open a vanity publishing imprint. Already, RWA, MWA, and SFWA have stated that they would stop recognizing the publisher based on this move.
There are some self -published writers who may see this change as a good thing, another sign that traditional publishing is changing away from “the old ways.” The problem is, what Harlequin is offering now goes beyond the basics of self-publishing and moves into the territory of a vanity publisher.
There’s debates about what makes a vanity versus what makes a self-publishing service, but let us be clear on my interpretation: a self-publishing service will allow you to make a book with little or no setup costs and charge you per book to make money. They may charge about two to three times what the actual printing cost is, and so in this way, they are not the most economic solution, but they are still not quite ripping off the writer. After all, the writer goes into the deal knowing that they have to pay for the most of books they want to sell.
On the other hand, a vanity service charges insanely high amounts of money for things that people can do for free themselves. A vanity service promises that there is a potential for great sales opportunities for paying for extra services, and most of these services are again things that a self-published writer could accomplish with little or no expense, and with very little time invested either. The publisher does very little work, and the rest of the writer’s money is all pure profit.
Read more »